Booksellers Share Their Thoughts on Changes to ABA Ends Policies, Part 1
In light of the ongoing conversation about the changes to the American Booksellers Association's ends policies regarding free expression and the First Amendment, Shelf Awareness has spoken to booksellers on the DEI Committee and the Booksellers Advisory Council to hear their thoughts on the changes. More will run this week.
Luis Correa |
"For me it's a step in the right direction," said Luis Correa, operations manager at Avid Bookshop in Athens, Ga. He explained that it's important to consider that working toward diversity, equity and inclusion is "going to be a work in progress," but the changes were a good way for the board and the ABA to consider a way of breaking the "circular logic" of having to tolerate intolerance in the name of the First Amendment, which could allow for hurtful, hateful and exclusionary speech to be part of the ABA.
Correa emphasized that this is not about the ABA telling member bookstores what they can or cannot carry in their own stores, or about advocating for certain books to be removed from the marketplace. He sees it as about making the ABA, a trade association, a more diverse and inclusive space, and in practical terms it is about the ABA's own activities, whether those be speakers invited to conferences, titles available in galley rooms or books included in mailings.
After an anti-trans book appeared in a monthly mailing last summer, that decision, in theory, could have been defended on the grounds of wanting to provide an open platform for all books regardless of their content. Instead the ABA took the position that it would not support books harmful to its membership and has committed to that position going forward, and Correa agrees that when it comes to its own activities, the ABA should "take the approach that is the most inclusive."
He conveyed frustration with the idea that supporting free expression automatically means having to tolerate intolerance, or that refusing to allow intolerant speech somehow makes a space less diverse and inclusive. Those intolerant voices "disagree with my being able to be married to a man, so where do we go from that? They disagree with my parents even being in this country, so why should I be a party to that? Why should the organization that represents all of us include voices like that?"
Correa added that he does not think it is courageous to point to the First Amendment as justification for stocking and selling books by authors with xenophobic, racist, homophobic or otherwise exclusionary views. Booksellers of course have that right, he continued, and can carry the work of any author they choose, but in the instances where those authors are elected officials or political candidates trying to turn their hateful views into law, whose book sales help fuel their election and re-election campaigns, it becomes "ultimately a harmful stance."
In discussions of the ends policies changes, booksellers frequently bring up hypothetical, slippery-slope arguments that Correa said can feel disingenuous at times. These arguments rarely consider the fact that real people are being harmed now by books with exclusionary views, and while the overall debate is sometimes treated as philosophical, these books can harm people in very real, very practical ways.
"There is a lot of nuance in this conversation," Correa remarked, noting that it's important to remember that "not every facet" of this issue is going to be addressed by a single broad change. But as the conversation goes on, he urges booksellers to approach it with openness and curiosity and to "think about the actual lives at stake here."
---
Jhoanna Belfer |
"I'm very happy to see they're trying to align practical matters with the mission and vision of the organization," said Jhoanna Belfer, owner of Bel Canto Books in Long Beach, Calif. While Belfer is relatively new to bookselling and to being part of the ABA, she has a background in the hospitality industry and has been a part of other trade organizations in the past. She notes that all too often those organizations will say they want to promote DEI initiatives or support anti-racist education but never follow through on a practical level.
"If we're saying that we are supporting DEI efforts, then we need to support them across the board throughout the organization," Belfer continued. That includes everything from programming and the make-up of the board of directors to encouraging underrepresented voices.
Drawing from her past experience with trade organizations and industry councils, she acknowledged that change can be difficult and challenging to enact, and can feel sudden. It can also be very easy for folks to second-guess why certain decisions have been made. As the conversation continues, she said, members need to make sure they're getting their points and concerns across.
Belfer added that she appreciates the efforts of the ABA staff and board and how hard they're working to "actually commit" to these principles and "put their money where their mouths are." --Alex Mutter