Kindle 2 Brushfires; One Bronx Cheer for BEA Changes
Dick Harte, president of BookSite, writes concerning yesterday's story about Kindle 2:
Carolyn Reidy is right in her appraisal that popular titles should be priced similarly whether traditionally bound or e-book editions. E-books have not lowered publishing costs of new popular titles so why should they receive a special discount? E-books are an avoidable and discretionary layer of production cost and administrative complexity laid on top of a relatively efficient form of publishing that has existed for centuries. The overall cost of publishing, promotion and distribution of a new title is greater with Kindle in the mix than if left to traditional book retailing including Amazon e-commerce.
Digital books have a number of valuable attributes. They are an efficient way to store and supply marginal backlist titles, and digital books may be supplied via print on demand or with proprietary platforms such as Kindle. We should encourage that evolution. But Amazon's attempt to gain unfair advantage over the primary distribution channel for books is not healthy for the industry, economy or consumer.
---
In the same story, Authors Guild executive director Paul Aiken said that the prospect that Amazon may be a "very dominant player who could squeeze most of the profits out of this new market is frightening for authors and publishers."
Hut Landon, executive director of the Northern California Independent Booksellers Association, wrote in response:
Perhaps the Authors Guild should suggest that authors not link only to Amazon on their websites. Acting as a sales agent for one dominant and frightening player may not be a wise long-term strategy. Many independent bookstores can fulfill orders as Amazon does, and IndieBound.org offers an affiliate program for authors and a connection to 200 independent bookstores.
---
Robin J. Dunn, director of St. John's College Bookstore, Annapolis, Md., writes about changes that will be made to BEA after this year's show (see story below):
I had already decided to give this year's BEA a miss precisely because it was scheduled for New York City, but now it looks as though last year's BEA will have been my last for a long time. New York is a fabulous city--but as a venue for a conference, it's far too expensive and difficult to get around. The Javits Center is a dreadful, and its meeting rooms are too small. The whole New York City BEA experience is literally just not worth the money it costs. Even though I had to fly across the country to get to it, the overall cost of attending the 2008 Los Angeles BEA was over $600 cheaper than the previous year's in New York, and I was able to accomplish much more. The plan to hold the event midweek--when it's harder for a great many booksellers to leave their stores for several days at a time--merely adds a further huge disadvantage. It's all very well wooing all those important publishers, but I do find myself wondering just who they will eventually have left to exhibit to.