Supreme Court Freedom to Read Move 'A Setback in Timing, But Not in Justice'
"The Supreme Court's decision not to review Little v. Llano is a setback in timing, but not in justice. 
We are undeterred and remain committed to defending the freedom to read in courtrooms across the country, including our ongoing challenges in the Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits. This issue will return to the Supreme Court in the near future, and we are working to establish strong, constitutional precedents that counter the Fifth Circuit's ruling."
--Dan Novack, v-p, associate general counsel at Penguin Random House, responding to the Supreme Court's decision not to hear an appeal of a Court of Appeals ruling that allows Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi to remove books from public libraries for political, religious, ideological, or any other reasons.
